| 000 | 01322nam a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c507779 _d507779 |
||
| 008 | 190225b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aMiller, Susan M. _92469 |
||
| 245 | _aThe consequences of legislative term limits for policy diffusion | ||
| 260 | _c2018 | ||
| 300 | _ap.573-585. | ||
| 520 | _aPolicy diffusion scholarship has long sought to understand when lawmakers will imitate innovations adopted by other jurisdictions and when they actually invest the time and resources necessary to learn about potential policies. We develop the theoretical rationale that term limits will reduce the incentive and capacity of state legislatures to gather information about policies available from previous adoptions in other states. We hypothesize that this will decrease the importance of previous adopters when term-limited legislators consider policy innovations. A multilevel analysis of the diffusion of eighty-seven policies between 1960 and 2009 provides support for this expectation. Our findings provide insight into the way in which institutional features shape policy diffusion. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 |
_aPublic policy _92470 |
||
| 700 |
_aNicholson-Crotty, Jill _92471 |
||
| 700 |
_aNicholson-Crotty, Sean _92472 |
||
| 773 | _aPolitical Research Quarterly | ||
| 906 | _aPolicy making | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cAR |
||