000			01019nam a2200157 4500
999			_c509284 _d509284
008			190429b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aAydinonat, N. Emrah _94897
245			_aThree conceptions of a theory of institutions
260			_c2018
300			_ap.550-568.
520			_aWe compare Guala’s unified theory of institutions with that of Searle and Greif. We show that unification can be many things and it may be associated with diverse explanatory goals. We also highlight some of the important shortcomings of Guala’s account: it does not capture all social institutions, its ability to bridge social ontology and game theory is based on a problematic interpretation of the type-token distinction, and its ability to make social ontology useful for social sciences is hindered by Guala’s interpretation of social institution types as social kinds akin to natural kinds. - Reproduced.
700			_aYlikpski, Petri _94898
773			_aVikalpa
906			_aInstitution building
942			_2ddc _cAR