| 000 | 01722nam a2200169 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c509413 _d509413 |
||
| 008 | 190507b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aSancino, Alessandro _95192 |
||
| 245 | _aBetween patronage and good governance: Organizational arrangements in (local) public appointment processes | ||
| 260 | _c2018 | ||
| 300 | _ap.785-802. | ||
| 520 | _aThis article investigates whether certain organizational arrangements in (local) public appointment processes could encourage the use of appointments as a tool of good governance rather than as a tool of patronage. Specifically, we studied the role of six organizational arrangements in 10 case studies of intra- and inter-organizational public appointment processes held in Italian local government. We found that good governance (in terms of perception of overall integrity and fairness) was found in processes of public appointments where there was independent scrutiny, and when the process involved local councillors and/or external stakeholders – that is, actors beyond those with the formal power to appoint. In these cases, making appointments was seen as a tool of good governance rather than of patronage. These organizational arrangements were more relevant than other ones such as the transparency of public advertisements, job descriptions and educational/professional requirements, and media and public awareness. The article describes the relevant literature and the research study, and discusses implications for research, policy and management. - Reproduced. | ||
| 700 |
_aSicilia, Mariafrancesca _95193 |
||
| 700 |
_aGrossi, Giuseppe _95194 |
||
| 773 | _aInternational Review of Administrative Sciences | ||
| 906 | _aGood governance | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cAR |
||