000			01352nam a22001817a 4500
999			_c509877 _d509877
008			190625b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aRoberts, Robert _96529
245			_aThe judicial response to the Presidential polarization of the administrative state
260			_c2019
300			_ap.3-20.
520			_aFrom the late 20th century through today, the relationship between the administrative state and the judiciary has undergone major changes. The same period has seen presidential administrations seek to make use of bureaucratic power to implement their public policy initiatives without having to obtain the approval of Congress. After reviewing the evolution of judicial oversight of the administrative state, the essay argues that the federal courts now make use of an ad hoc approach for determining the scope of judicial oversight of the administrative process. The essay argues that the use of this ad hoc approach has done serious damage to the administrative state, providing insufficient guidelines for presidential administrations to make use of bureaucratic power to implement public policy initiatives. - Reproduced.
650			_aJudiciary _96530
650			_aPresident power _96531
650			_aBureaucracy _96532
773			_aAmerican Review of Public Administration
906			_aPublic administration
942			_cAR