000			01906nam a2200193 4500
999			_c509880 _d509880
008			190625b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aGetha-Taylor, Heather et al _96545
245			_aCollaborating in the absence of trust?: what collaborative governance theory and practice can learn from the literatures of conflict resolution, psychology, and law
260			_c2019
300			_ap.51-64.
520			_aTrust is often touted as both an element of success and an outcome of interest in collaboration research, usually without defining the term or acknowledging the possibility of collaborating when trust is diminished or absent. This article broadens our theoretical understanding of the concept of trust, and the ability to collaborate in the absence of trust, by looking at it through the lenses of conflict resolution, psychology, and law. The disciplines examined in this article emphasize diverse approaches to examining trust on the interpersonal, interorganizational, and regime levels. While agreeing that trust is an asset, these disciplines also offer practical strategies for collaborating when trust is diminished or absent. Drawing on the theory and literature of conflict resolution, psychology, and law, we offer the following definition of collaborative trust: Collaborative trust is an individual perception that is the product of one’s assessments, experiences, and dispositions, in which one believes, and is willing to act on, the words, actions, and decisions of others. This can include a reliance on principles, rules, norms, and decision-making procedures that articulate collective expectations. - Reproduced.
650			_aGovernance _96546
650			_aConflict resolution _96547
650			_aTrust _96548
650			_aCollaborative governance _96549
773			_aAmerican Review of Public Administrative
906			_aPublic administration
942			_2ddc _cAR