| 000 | 01640nam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c509890 _d509890 |
||
| 008 | 190626b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aSandfort, Jodi _96594 |
||
| 245 | _aPerformance management regimes in practice: examining the local agencies implementing temporary assistance for needy families | ||
| 260 | _c2019 | ||
| 300 | _ap.145-158. | ||
| 520 | _aPerformance management regimes significantly influence public management practice and policy implementation. Yet, within public administration scholarship, there is insufficient attention to how regimes are reified through policy implementation or how they influence management decisions and outcomes. In this analysis, we considered the robustness of policy regime theory to deepen our understanding of performance management. We examine an empirical setting where two competing performance regimes seek to shape local program delivery in social welfare. We use this case to expand regime theory by highlighting the significant role of local managers in interpreting conflicting regime signals. Their interpretation directly shapes operational practices. The analysis highlights that further theorizing about policy regimes should consider various levels within implementation system, particularly the significance of managerial authority. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 |
_aPerformance management _96595 |
||
| 650 |
_aPublic management _96596 |
||
| 650 |
_aIntergovernmental relations _96597 |
||
| 700 |
_aOng, Sook Jin _96598 |
||
| 700 |
_aMckay, Catherine _96599 |
||
| 773 | _aAmerican Review of Public Administration | ||
| 906 | _aPublic administration | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cAR |
||