| 000 | 01116nam a2200157 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c510589 _d510589 |
||
| 008 | 190826b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aLauer, Richard _98830 |
||
| 245 | _aIs social ontology prior to social scientific methodology? | ||
| 260 | _c2019 | ||
| 300 | _ap.171-189. | ||
| 520 | _aIn this article, I examine “Ontology Matters!” (OM!) arguments. OM! arguments conclude that ontology can contribute to empirical success in social science. First, I capture the common form between different OM! arguments. Second, I describe quantifier variance as discussed in metaontology. Third, I apply quantifier variance to the common form of OM! arguments. I then present two ways in which ontology is prior to social science methodology, one realist and one pragmatic. I argue that a pragmatic interpretation of ontology’s priority gives proponents of realist OM! arguments a special burden that they must meet to render their argument successful. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 |
_aSocial ontology _98831 |
||
| 773 | _aPhilosophy of the Social Sciences | ||
| 906 | _aSocial Sciences - Research | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cAR |
||