000			01304nam a2200157 4500
999			_c510590 _d510590
008			190826b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aSturm, Thomas _98832
245			_aFormal versus bounded norms in the psychology of rationality: toward a multilevel analysis of their relationship
260			_c2019
300			_ap.190-209.
520			_aIt is often claimed that formal and optimizing norms of the standard conception of rationality and the heuristics of the bounded rationality approach are at odds with one another. This claim, I argue, is an overly complex one. In order to discuss it adequately, I introduce two sets of distinctions: (a) a system of different kinds of relations between conceptions of rationality, namely relations of elimination, compatibility, and complementarity, and (b) three different levels of possible relations between rules of different theories of rationality—the levels of empirical explanation, normative justification, and normative prescription. I argue that formal and bounded rules are compatible and complementary at the levels of explanation and justification, but probably not so at the level of prescription. - Reproduced.
650			_aRationality _98833
773			_aPhilosophy of the Social Sciences
906			_aRationalism
942			_2ddc _cAR