000			01496nam a2200145 4500
999			_c512253 _d512253
008			191115b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aJancsics, David _913287
245			_aCorruption as resource transfer: An interdisciplinary synthesis
260			_bPublic Administration Review
300			_a79(4), Jul-Aug, 2019: p.523-537.
520			_aDespite significant investment in anticorruption instruments in the past decades, confusion about their effectiveness remains. While a growing body of scholarship claims that anticorruption reforms have generally failed, other scholars have shown that particular anticorruption tools may actually work. A likely explanation for these puzzling outcomes is that public administration research holds a mistaken view of corruption, and improperly selected anticorruption strategies often target the wrong type of corruption. To overcome this problem, this article proposes a four‐cell typology of corruption, reflecting two critical dimensions along which most corrupt behaviors occur: the resource transfer and the primary beneficiary. Synthesizing recent research developments, this article introduces a new conceptualization of corruption that integrates perspectives from several disciplines. It also offers a series of propositions concerning how each corruption type could be fought. The article concludes with implications for research and practice.
773			_aPublic Administration Review
906			_aCorruption
942			_2ddc _cAR