| 000 | 01141nam a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c512415 _d512415 |
||
| 008 | 191121b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aEspeland, Wendy _913646 |
||
| 245 | _aEthical dimensions of quantification | ||
| 260 | _bSocial Science Information | ||
| 300 | _a58(2), Jun, 2019: p.238-260. | ||
| 520 | _aThe ethical dimensions of quantification are seldom analysed. We examine three ethical features that are characteristic of quantification – its capacity to express or mediate power, focus attention, and shape opportunity structures. We do so in the context of three recent examples of new types of quantification : university rankings, the racial classification of Asians in the US, and facial recognition algorithms. Our examples highlight the importance of understanding the varied and complex ways that quantification creates and organizes social relations, and the effect of this on multiple forms of inequality. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 |
_aAlgorithms _913647 |
||
| 650 |
_aQuantification _913648 |
||
| 700 |
_aYung, Vincent _913649 |
||
| 773 | _aSocial Science Information | ||
| 906 | _aEthics | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cAR |
||