000			01658nam a2200169 4500
999			_c513000 _d513000
008			200108b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aWhittemore, Andrew H. _953179
245			_aExploring the acceptability of densification: How positive framing and source framing and source credibility can change attitudes
260			_bUrban Affairs Review
300			_a55(5), Sep, 2019: p.1339-1369.
520			_aPlanners often divisively advocate densification in developed areas. This article investigates the possibility that framing densifying development in positive ways may reduce conflict around greater density in developed urban areas of the United States. We use an online survey that asks verified voters in local elections (n = 772) to describe their feelings toward a hypothetical densifying infill development in their neighborhoods before and after reading various framing statements. In particular, we consider the impact of these statements when they originate among planners versus when they originate among lay community experts. We use regression analyses to explore how reactions to the development relate to demographic characteristics and other aspects of respondents’ identities, and find that, while positive framing generally improves perceptions of the development regardless of its source, these effects are limited among respondents expressing concern about specific development impacts, among particular income groups, and in some neighborhood types. - Reproduced.
650			_aCitizen participation _915212
700			_aBenDor, Todd K. _915213
773			_aUrban Affairs Review
906			_aLand use
942			_2ddc _cAR