000			01319nam a2200157 4500
999			_c513037 _d513037
008			200109b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aLambelet, Sebastien _915282
245			_aFilling in the resource gap of urban regime analysis to make it travel in time and space
260			_bUrban Affairs Review
300			_a55(5), Sep, 2019: p.1402-1432.
520			_aResponding to recent studies that have argued that urban regime analysis (URA) is inappropriate for studying urban politics in Europe or in the twenty-first century, this article argues that URA is a powerful analytical tool to understand the dynamics of contemporary urban governance. It does so by drawing on evidence from the Swiss cities of Zurich and Bern since the turn of the millennium. In both cities, the realization of major urban projects has relied on strong public-private cooperation structured around the mobilization and exchange of five resources (“land,” “law,” “money,” “expertise,” and “democratic support”). Drawing on this empirical evidence, the article concludes by presenting two types of regimes: the PRIVATE-public regime and the PUBLIC-private regime. - Reproduced.
650			_aPublic private partnership _915283
773			_aUrban Affairs Review
906			_aLocal government
942			_2ddc _cAR