| 000 | 01516nam a2200157 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c513267 _d513267 |
||
| 008 | 200205b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aLinovski, Orly _915850 |
||
| 245 | _aShifting agendas: Private consultants and public planning policy | ||
| 260 | _bUrban Affairs Review | ||
| 300 | _a55(6), Nov, 2019: p.1666-1701. | ||
| 520 | _aDespite concerns about the privatization of urban planning practices, there is little known about the professional actors involved in this restructuring. Private-sector consultants, though beholden to the same professional standards as public-sector employees, face competing pressures of an entrepreneurial fee-for-service business model. This article examines the role of planning consultants in shaping public policy agendas, by analyzing the redevelopment of Downsview Park in Toronto, Ontario. Drawing from interview and archival data, I find that private-sector planning consultants had influence in prioritizing policy agendas by propagating the need for sped-up processes and allowing landowners to “pay for priority.” The fluidity of professionals between firms, sectors, and projects reinforced the perceived value and neutrality of consultant expertise. These strategies worked to erode the differences between public- and private-sector planning processes, resulting in a high degree of influence for development interests. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 |
_aPrivatisation _915851 |
||
| 773 | _aUrban Affairs Review | ||
| 906 | _aUrban planning | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cAR |
||