| 000 | 01724nam a2200169 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c513370 _d513370 |
||
| 008 | 200212b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aDemircioglu, Mehmet Akif _916111 |
||
| 245 | _aWhy does innovation in government occur and persist? Evidence from the Australian government | ||
| 260 | _bAsia Pacific Journal of Public Administration | ||
| 300 | _a41(4), Dec, 2019: p.217-229. | ||
| 520 | _aMany studies of public sector innovation concern the organisational and individual levels, examining why certain public organisations, leaders and staff are more innovative than others. Wider questions remain as to why some governments are particularly innovative, and how innovation can persist in governments. To answer these questions, Australian experience is addressed in terms of why, and the extent to which, the Australian government is innovative. An analysis of government and government-related documents, as well as scholarly literature on public management reform and innovation attempts, indicates that the crucial factors affecting innovation have been the perception of innovation as a necessity, the duration and intensity of innovation, the span and scope of innovation, the extent of grassroots involvement in generating innovation, and the various isomorphic effects related to innovation. The nature and significance of each of these factors are discussed, along with insights on innovativeness in government and the value of further relevant research and analysis. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 |
_aPublic sector _916112 |
||
| 650 |
_aAustralian Public Service Innovation _916113 |
||
| 773 | _aAsia Pacific Journal of Public Administration | ||
| 906 | _aPublic administration - Australia | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cAR |
||