| 000 | 01872nam a22001817a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c513373 _d513373 |
||
| 008 | 200213b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aMosley, Jennifer E. _916120 |
||
| 245 | _aHow structural variations in collaborative governance networks influence advocacy involvement and outcomes | ||
| 260 | _bPublic Administration Review | ||
| 300 | _a79(5), Sep/Oct, 2019: p.629-640. | ||
| 520 | _aCollaborative governance is intended to solve complex problems and promote democratic outcomes by connecting groundālevel stakeholders with government. In order for these goals to be met, however, participants must have meaningful influence and opportunities for voice. Using national survey data from Continuums of Care (CoCs) mandated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, this article investigates what structural characteristics of collaborative governance networks are related to promoting stakeholder inclusion and voice through policy advocacy involvement. Specifically, it investigates which network characteristics are associated with (1) the frequency of advocacy involvement by the network, (2) providers' engagement in and influence over that advocacy, and (3) the CoC having stronger relationships with policy makers. Findings show significant relationships between greater network capacity and network advocacy, and between network governance structure and provider engagement and influence in that advocacy. Networks have stronger relationships with policy makers when providers are more engaged, providers have more influence, network capacity is higher, and direct advocacy tactics are used. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 |
_aPublic administration networks _916121 |
||
| 650 |
_aGovernance networks _916122 |
||
| 700 |
_aJarpe, Meghan _916123 |
||
| 773 | _aPublic Administration Review | ||
| 906 | _aPublic administration | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cAR |
||