| 000 | 01746nam a22001937a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c513619 _d513619 |
||
| 008 | 200313b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aSchmidt, Vivien _916793 |
||
| 245 | _aConceptualizing throughput legitimacy: Procedural mechanisms of accountability, transparency, inclusiveness and openness in EU governance | ||
| 260 | _bPublic Administration | ||
| 300 | _a97(4), 2019: p.727-740. | ||
| 520 | _aThis symposium demonstrates the potential for throughput legitimacy as a concept for shedding empirical light on the strengths and weaknesses of multi‐level governance, as well as challenging the concept theoretically. This article introduces the symposium by conceptualizing throughput legitimacy as an ‘umbrella concept’, encompassing a constellation of normative criteria not necessarily empirically interrelated. It argues that in order to interrogate multi‐level governance processes in all their complexity, it makes sense for us to develop normative standards that are not naïve about the empirical realities of how power is exercised within multi‐level governance, or how it may interact with legitimacy. We argue that while throughput legitimacy has its normative limits, it can be substantively useful for these purposes. While being no replacement for input and output legitimacy, throughput legitimacy offers distinctive normative criteria—accountability, transparency, inclusiveness and openness—and points towards substantive institutional reforms. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 |
_aAccountability _916794 |
||
| 650 |
_aTransparency _916795 |
||
| 650 |
_aGovernance - European Union _916796 |
||
| 700 |
_aWood, Matthew _916797 |
||
| 773 | _aPublic Administration | ||
| 906 | _aPublic administration | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||