000			01696nam a22001817a 4500
999			_c513621 _d513621
008			200313b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aCoen, David _916802
245			_aBetween cheap talk and epistocracy: The logic of interest group access in the European Parliament's committee hearings
260			_bPublic Administration
300			_a97(4), 2019: p.754-769.
520			_aImproving policy deliberation is a central objective for the European Union's institutions. Focusing on the European Parliament's committee hearings as an understudied area of European governance, we aim to understand their role, and their capacity to improve its procedural legitimacy. Building on theoretical work on interest group access and deliberation we argue that hearings can serve three purposes: (i) coordinative; (ii) epistemic; (iii) enhancing public participation. We construct a set of measures and assess an entire population of participants in hearings (2009–14), concentrating on three committees. Our analyses show that hearings serve a hybrid purpose between coordinative and epistemic. At the top end, we observe a core group of gatekeepers representing the dominant constituencies. Simultaneously, research organizations are granted unique access as experts that de‐politicize debates. Theoretically, we contribute to discussions on interest group access while providing an innovative set of tools for its measurement, and the first dataset of its kind. - Reproduced.
650			_aPressure group _916803
650			_aEuropean Parliament Committee _916804
700			_aKatsaitis, Alexander _916805
773			_aPublic Administration
906			_aInterest group
942			_2ddc _cAR