000			02069nam a2200169 4500
999			_c513693 _d513693
008			200331b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aCogley, Nathaniel Terence _918786
245			_aWhich immigrants should be naturalized? Which should be deported? Evidence from a survey experiment in Cote d'lvoire
260			_bPolitical Research Quarterly
300			_a72(3), Sep, 2019: p.653-668.
520			_aExperimental studies on immigration attitudes have been conducted overwhelmingly in Western countries and have focused on immigrant admission and naturalization, neglecting deportation as a possible outcome. In a survey experiment in Côte d’Ivoire, where immigrants represent more than one-tenth of the population, we randomized attributes of hypothetical immigrants to determine which factors influenced respondents’ support for naturalization or deportation compared with staying in the country without citizenship. Support for naturalization was shaped by several expected economic and social attributes, while deportation preferences were influenced primarily by the immigrant’s legal status and level of savings. Cultural proximity produced mixed results, with respondents less likely to support the naturalization of immigrants from neighboring African countries but also less likely to deport immigrants with whom they shared a religious faith. Finally, respondents were more likely to support the naturalization of immigrants who planned to vote if granted citizenship, especially when they were of the same religion as the respondent, indicating a degree of electoral calculation in a context where voting patterns are associated with religious identities. Together, these findings suggest that citizen preferences for naturalization and deportation are influenced by somewhat different factors, a possibility that warrants further testing in other contexts. - Reproduced.
700			_aDoces, John Andrew _916978
700			_aWhitaker, Beth Elise _916979
773			_aPolitical Research Quarterly
906			_aMIGRATION
942			_2ddc _cAR