| 000 | 01072nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c514237 _d514237 |
||
| 008 | 201019b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aGreene, Catherine _918728 |
||
| 245 | _aNomadic concepts, variable choice and the social sciences | ||
| 260 | _aPhilosophy of the Social Sciences | ||
| 300 | _a50(1), Jan, 2020: p.3-22 | ||
| 520 | _aThe observation that concepts used by social scientists are often problematic is not new; they have been described as Ballung concepts, cluster concepts, essentially contested, and reflexive; however, the need to work with these concepts remains. This article addresses the problem of variable choice in the social sciences by exploring and extending Woodward’s recommendations. This article demonstrates why Woodward’s criteria are difficult to apply in the social sciences and proposes an alternative, but complementary, framework for assessing variables. - Reproduced | ||
| 650 |
_aVariable choice, Wellbeing, Democracy _918722 |
||
| 773 | _aPhilosophy of the Social Sciences | ||
| 906 | _aSOCIAL SCIENCES | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||