000 02144nam a22001577a 4500
999 _c514462
_d514462
008 201106b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _aBowles, Samuel, and Carlin, Wendy.
_920851
245 _aWhat students learn in economics 101: Time for a change
260 _aJournal of Economic Literature
300 _a58(1), Mar, 2020: p.176-214
520 _aWe make the case for a shift in what students learn in a first economics course, taking as our exemplar Paul Samuelson's paradigm-setting 1948 text. In the shadow of the Great Depression, Samuelson made Keynesian economics an essential component of what every economics student should know. By contrast, leading textbooks today were written in the glow of the Great Moderation and the tamed cyclical fluctuations in the two decades prior to 2007. Here, using topic modeling, we document Samuelson's novelty and the evolution of the content of introductory textbooks since, and we put forward three propositions. First, as was the case in the aftermath of the Great Depression, new problems now challenge the content of our introductory courses; these include mounting inequalities, climate change, concerns about the future of work, and financial instability. Second, the tools required to address these problems, including strategic interaction, limited information, principal-agent models, new behavioral foundations, and dynamic processes including instability and path dependence, are available (indeed widely taught in PhD programs). And third, as we will illustrate by reference to a new open access introductory text, a course integrating these tools into a new benchmark model can be accessible, engaging, coherent and, as a result, successfully taught to first-year students. Deployed to address the new problems, following Samuelson's example, the new benchmark provides the basis for integrating not only micro- and macroeconomics but also the analysis of both market failures and the limits of government interventions.
650 _aMacroeconomics, Monetary economics
_920852
773 _aJournal of Economic Literature
906 _aECONOMICS - EDUCATION
942 _cAR