000			01597nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c514511 _d514511
008			201110b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aMoloney, Kim and Rosenbloom, David H. _920957
245			_aCreating space for public administration in International organization studies
260			_aAmerican Review of Public Administration
300			_a50(3), Apr, 2020: p. 227-243
520			_aThe emergent global administrative order includes more than 800 international and regional organizations. Just as the rise of the modern state placed greater importance on the study of public administration, the growth of multistate organizations, their agendas, and personnel require research that draws upon contemporary and classical public administrative thought. This article employs multiple lenses to explore the utility of public administrative theory and empirically based knowledge in analyzing the behavior of international and regional organizations. Specifically, while remaining cognizant of differences between international organizations and sovereign states, we consider the utility of the politics–administration dichotomy, representative bureaucracy, individual and employee due process and other rights, and broader questions of accountability in understanding the administrative life and influence of international organizations in global governance.- Reproduced
650			_aInternational organizations, Legal-administrative, International civil servants, Due process _919214
773			_aAmerican Review of Public Administration
906			_aCIVIL SERVICE
942			_cAR