000			01489nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c514583 _d514583
008			201120b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aHjorth, Thomas Lopdrup and Gay, Paul Du. _921151
245			_aSpeaking truth to power? Anti-bureaucratic romanticism from critical organizational theorizing to the White House
260			_aOrganization
300			_a 27(3), May, 2020: p.441-453
520			_aIn spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance toward bureaucracy and the state. In this article, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In doing so, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.- Reproduced
650			_a Anti-bureaucracy, Bureaucracy, CMS, Critique, Organization theory, Populism, Trump _919344
773			_aOrganization
906			_aBUREAUCRACY - UNITED STATES
942			_cAR