| 000 | 01259nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c514654 _d514654 |
||
| 008 | 201125b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aRudik, Ivan. _921459 |
||
| 245 | _aOptimal climate policy when damages are unknown | ||
| 260 | _aAmerican Economic Journal Economic Policy | ||
| 300 | _a12(2), May, 2020: p.340-373 | ||
| 520 | _aIntegrated assessment models (IAMs) are economists' primary tool for analyzing the optimal carbon tax. Damage functions, which link temperature to economic impacts, have come under fire because of their assumptions that may be incorrect in significant but a priori unknowable ways. Here I develop recursive IAM frameworks to model uncertainty, learning, and concern for misspecification about damages. I decompose the carbon tax into channels capturing state uncertainty, insurance motives, and precautionary saving. Damage learning improves ex ante welfare by 750 billion USD. If damage functions are misspecified and omit the potential for catastrophic damages, robust control may be beneficial ex post. – Reproduced | ||
| 650 |
_aClimate; Natural Disasters and Their Management; Global Warming _921460 |
||
| 773 | _aAmerican Economic Journal Economic Policy | ||
| 906 | _aENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||