| 000 | 01190nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c514703 _d514703 |
||
| 008 | 201130b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aHatfield , William John. Jagadeesan ,Ravi and Kominers, Duke Scott . _921603 |
||
| 245 | _aMatching in networks with bilateral contracts: Corrigendum | ||
| 260 | _aAmerican Economic Journal Microeconomics | ||
| 300 | _a12(3), Aug, 2020: p.277-285 | ||
| 520 | _aHatfield and Kominers (2012) introduced a model of matching in networks with bilateral contracts and showed that stable outcomes exist in supply chains when firms' preferences over contracts are fully substitutable. Hatfield and Kominers (2012) also asserted that in their setting, full substitutability is equivalent to the assumption that all indirect utility representations of each firm's preferences are quasisubmodular; we show here that this claimed equivalence result does not hold in general. We show instead that full substitutability is equivalent to weak quasisubmodularity of all indirect utility representations. - Reproduced | ||
| 650 |
_aMatching Theory _921604 |
||
| 773 | _aAmerican Economic Journal Microeconomics | ||
| 906 | _aBARGAINING THEORY | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||