| 000 | 01258nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c514768 _d514768 |
||
| 008 | 201212b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aFumagalli , Roberto. _921706 |
||
| 245 | _aOn the individuation of choice options | ||
| 260 | _aPhilosophy of The Social Sciences | ||
| 300 | _a 50(4), Jul, 2020: p,338-365 | ||
| 520 | _aDecision theorists have attempted to accommodate several violations of decision theory’s axiomatic requirements by modifying how agents’ choice options are individuated and formally represented. In recent years, prominent authors have worried that these modifications threaten to trivialize decision theory, make the theory unfalsifiable, impose overdemanding requirements on decision theorists, and hamper decision theory’s internal coherence. In this paper, I draw on leading descriptive and normative works in contemporary decision theory to address these prominent concerns. In doing so, I articulate and assess several different criteria for individuating and formally representing agents’ choice options.- Reproduced | ||
| 650 |
_aDecision theory, Rationality, Axioms, Preferences, Consistency, Choice options _919620 |
||
| 773 | _aPhilosophy of The Social Sciences | ||
| 906 | _aDECISION THEORY | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||