000			01637nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c514831 _d514831
008			201224b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aMcGovern, Stephen J. _921825
245			_aAnalyzing urban politics: A mobilization-governance framework
260			_aUrban Affairs Review
300			_a56(4), Jul, 2020: p.1011-1052
520			_aThis paper begins by examining recent scholarship on the carceral state and its political consequences as an opportunity to reassess the study of urban politics. Along with illuminating how race structures local power relations, research on the carceral state exposes gaps in the long-standing, political–economy paradigm, and in particular regime theory, concerning the political lives of ordinary people and the role of ideas, values, and ideology in shaping political behavior. At the same time, this paper recognizes the powerful impact of market forces on urban governance, as well as regime theory’s emphasis on organizational resources, intergroup collaboration, and coalition building in accounting for business influence over city policymaking. A new analytical approach is proposed—the mobilization–governance framework—that seeks to build on the insights of scholarship on the carceral state while retaining still-valuable aspects of regime theory. A case study of contemporary politics in Philadelphia is presented to illustrate how the mobilization–governance framework might be applied. – Reproduced
650			_aUrban politics, Regime theory, Carceral state, Mobilization _919791
773			_aUrban Affairs Review
906			_aURBAN DEVELOPMENT
942			_cAR