000			01100nam a22001457a 4500
999			_c514924 _d514924
008			210102b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aShandra, J.M., Restivo M. and Sommer, J.M. _922024
245			_aAppetite for destructions? China, Ecologically unequal exchange, and forest loss*
260			_aRural Sociology
300			_a85(2), Jun, 2020: p.346-375
520			_aWe test the hypothesis from the theory of ecologically unequal exchange that agricultural exports to China are related to increased forest loss in low‐ and middle‐income nations exporting to it. We do so by analyzing data for 75 low‐ and middle‐income nations using ordinary least squares regression. We find support for our hypothesis that flows of agricultural exports from low‐ and middle‐income nations to China are related to increased forest loss in exporting nations. We also find that a country's total agricultural exports, proximity of forest to infrastructure, and protected areas tend to increase forest loss. - Reproduced
773			_aRural Sociology
906			_aECOLOGY - CHINA
942			_cAR