000			01603nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c514926 _d514926
008			210102b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aGolding, Shaun and Bramon, Monica M. _922030
245			_aScience as snake oil: Rural development, discourse, and the broken promise of tech jobs in vermont
260			_aRural Sociology
300			_a85(2), Jun, 2020: p.408-435
520			_aThis paper examines the public conversation surrounding two failed technology businesses in rural Vermont communities, documenting a particular techno‐development discourse. Engaging with the literatures of rural development and science and technology studies (STS), the paper frames this discourse as a mechanism of power exercised by private capital. It analyzes how perspectives shared in news and social media functioned to attribute financial, technological, and moral authority to developers while dividing communities and scapegoating the state. Our work highlights the need for scholars to be conscious of techno‐development discourses that prioritize capital interests over community interests. Rather than using hegemonic conceptualizations of technology, we advocate for development that advances more flexible, local understandings of technology. And rather than centering high‐tech development as a vehicle for extending prosperity across space, we propose that greater attention be paid to extending high wages across industrial sectors. - Reproduced
650			_aCommunity and Economic Development _922031
773			_aRural Sociology
906			_aCOMPUTERS AND TECHNOLOGY
942			_cAR