| 000 | 01713nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c516482 _d516482 |
||
| 008 | 210226b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aKoliev, Faradj _925610 |
||
| 245 | _aShaming and democracy: Explaining inter-state shaming in international organizations | ||
| 260 | _aInternational Political Science Review | ||
| 300 | _a41(4), Sep, 2020: p.538-553 | ||
| 520 | _aWhy do some states name and shame norm-violating states while other states abstain? Inter-state naming and shaming is typically viewed as a political tool to punish adversaries and reward allies. In this study, I propose a regime-type explanation for inter-state shaming in international politics. I pose two interrelated questions. First, are democracies more prone to condemn norm violations than non-democratic countries? Second, are democracies likely to shame each other in cases of norm violations? In search of answers to these questions, I use a unique dataset on inter-state shaming the International Labour Organization (ILO) for the period 1991–2011. In line with my main argument, the results suggest that democracies are more likely than non-democracies to engage in the shaming of norm violators, while providing no evidence for special relations between democracies. In addition, this study unpacks other factors influencing the inter-state shaming. The findings have implications for how we understand state interactions in international politics. – Reproduced | ||
| 650 |
_aInternational organizations, Human rights, Labor rights, International labour organization, Naming and shaming, Democracy _923001 |
||
| 773 | _aInternational Political Science Review | ||
| 906 | _aINTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||