| 000 | 01339nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c516654 _d516654 |
||
| 008 | 210310b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aSinha, Adweetiya _925771 |
||
| 245 | _aIndian judiciary: A hornets’ nest | ||
| 260 | _aBihar Journal of Public Administration | ||
| 300 | _a17(1), Jan-June, 2020: p.144-153 | ||
| 520 | _aThere are multiple problems in the three tier hierarchy of India’s judicial system. The issues with other two organs of the government are highlighted and deliberated upon on public forums but the problems of Indian Judicial System are relegated to the background. The problem of judicial pendency in India is something we must reckon. Two issues of the Economic Survey have simultaneously focused on judicial pendency at length. The problem of judicial pendency is linked with judicial vacancies and several other problems like poor infrastructure, red-tapism etc. Apart from them judicial secrecy is also a matter of concern. India’s ranking in the Rule of Law Index is continuously deteriorating. We must acknowledge all the problems before trying to find their plausible solutions. – Reproduced | ||
| 650 |
_aPendency of cases, Persisting-vacancy, Red Tapism, appointment, Rule of law _923208 |
||
| 773 | _aBihar Journal of Public Administration | ||
| 906 | _aJUDICIARY - INDIA | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||