000			01620nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c516681 _d516681
008			210310b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aRanjan, Rakesh and Suman, Suprita _925974
245			_aAbrogation of the article 370 and 35a: A comparison with merger of swat in Pakistan
260			_aBihar Journal of Public Administration
300			_a17(1), Jan-June, 2020: p.182-189
520			_aThe present paper intends to discuss an important issue of disturbed territory of J&K in India and compares it with the similar situation of Swat in Pakistan. We have attempted to underline the different approaches adopted to solve the issue by India and Pakistan in their respective ways. Kashmir for India and Swat for Pakistan, which maintain special status in their respective constitutions. Both these states known for their pristine beauty and ethnic and cultural diversity. These two territories have been victim of militancy. The regular casualty violation of human rights, law and order remained economic burden on the pocket of their respective governments. India took a constitutional measure whereas Pakistan resorted to shun the problem with use of military. In August 2019, the Government of India abrogated the part of constitution, Art. 370 giving special status to J&K, to resolve the problem. Pakistan did also made constitutional amendment but adopted the coercive measures. – Reproduced
650			_aJ&K, Swat, Special status, Militancy, Constitutional measures _923240
773			_aBihar Journal of Public Administration
906			_aPOLITICS AND GOVERNMENT - JAMMU AND KASHMIR
942			_cAR