000			01653nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c517079 _d517079
008			210630b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aGronow, Antti Wagner, Paul Anttila and Tuomas Yla _926055
245			_aExplaining collaboration in consensual and conflictual governance networks
260			_aPublic Administration: An International Quarterly
300			_a98(3), Sep, 2020: p.730-745
520			_aThe conditions under which policy beliefs and influential actors shape collaborative behaviour in governance networks are not well understood. This article applies exponential random graph models to network data from Finland and Sweden to investigate how beliefs, reputational power and the role of public authorities structure collaboration ties in the two countries’ climate change governance networks. Results show that only in Finland's conflictual climate policy domain do actors collaborate with those with similar beliefs and with reputational power, while only in Sweden's consensual climate policy domain do public authorities play central impartial coordinating roles. These results indicate that conflict is present in a governance network when beliefs and reputational power determine collaboration and that it is absent when public authorities occupy central roles. They also suggest that relative success in climate policy action is likely to occur when public authorities take on network manager roles. Reproduced
650			_aPolicy beliefs, Collaborative behaviour, Governance networks, Climate change _926056
773			_aPublic Administration: An International Quarterly
906			_aCLIMATE POLICY
942			_cAR