| 000 | 00968nam a22001457a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c517269 _d517269 |
||
| 008 | 210707b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aLevine, David K. and Mattozzi, Andrea _926237 |
||
| 245 | _aVoter turnout with peer punishment | ||
| 260 | _aThe American Economic Review | ||
| 300 | _a110(10), Oct, 2020: p.3298-3314 | ||
| 520 | _aWe introduce a model where social norms of voting participation are strategically chosen by competing political parties and determine voters' turnout. Social norms must be enforced through costly peer monitoring and punishment. When the cost of enforcement of social norms is low, the larger party is always advantaged. Otherwise, in the spirit of Olson (1965), the smaller party may be advantaged. Our model shares features of the ethical voter model and it delivers novel and empirically relevant comparative statics results. – Reproduced | ||
| 773 | _aThe American Economic Review | ||
| 906 | _aELECTION | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||