| 000 | 01372nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c517545 _d517545 |
||
| 008 | 210719b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aBray, J. Rob et al _926773 |
||
| 245 | _aPerformance management and evaluation meets culture and politics: Australia’s experience | ||
| 260 | _aAsia Pacific Journal of Public Administration | ||
| 300 | _a42(4), Dec, 2020: p.290-302 | ||
| 520 | _aAn underlying tension exists between the fundamental elements of accountability, government decision-making, performance management, evidence-based policy and the measurement of results. This article considers this through three lenses: evaluation of government policies and programs; program structures and performance indicators; and the challenges of big data. While use of new technologies and big data opens up opportunities for strengthened evidence-based policy, this does not address the tension between a disciplined results-based approach to government decision-making and the inherently political nature of these decisions. There remain also important challenges to the effective development and use of big data in government. – Reproduced | ||
| 650 |
_aPublic administration, Performance management, Evidence-based policy, Big data _925420 |
||
| 773 | _aAsia Pacific Journal of Public Administration | ||
| 906 | _aPUBLIC ADMINISTRATION - AUSTRALIA | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||