| 000 | 01197nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c517629 _d517629 |
||
| 008 | 210722b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aEinav, Liran et al _927566 |
||
| 245 | _aScreening and selection: The case of mammograms | ||
| 260 | _aThe American Economic Review | ||
| 300 | _a110(12), Dec, 2020: p.3836-3870 | ||
| 520 | _aWe analyze selection into screening in the context of recommendations that breast cancer screening start at age 40. Combining medical claims with a clinical oncology model, we document that compliers with the recommendation are less likely to have cancer than younger women who select into screening or women who never screen. We show this selection is quantitatively important: shifting the recommendation from age 40 to 45 results in three times as many deaths if compliers were randomly selected than under the estimated patterns of selection. The results highlight the importance of considering characteristics of compliers when making and designing recommendations. – Reproduced | ||
| 650 |
_aHealth - Government policy, Health regulation, Public health _927567 |
||
| 773 | _aThe American Economic Review | ||
| 906 | _aHEALTH BEHAVIOUR | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||