000			01256nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c517701 _d517701
008			210724b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aWeng, Shi-Hong et al _927961
245			_aResponding to the Coronavirus pandemic: A tale of two cities
260			_aAmerican Review of Public Administration
300			_a50(6-7), Aug-Oct, 2020: p.497-504
520			_aThis study compares the experiences of Shanghai in China and Los Angeles in the United States to illustrate four tension points in pandemic responses: immediacy versus thoroughness, transparency versus secrecy and security, centralization versus decentralization, and state-driven solutions versus coproduction. Based on the case analysis, strategic management and planning practices in six stages of pandemic response are recommended. The study also suggests research questions for future comparative research to examine more carefully how pandemic responses should vary due to institutional differences and local contextualization and adaptation. - Reproduced
650			_aCOVID-19, Pandemic response, Emergency management, Comparative public management, Public governance _925675
773			_aAmerican Review of Public Administration
906			_aCOVID-19 PANDEMIC
942			_cAR