| 000 | 01374nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c517705 _d517705 |
||
| 008 | 210724b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aDowney, Davia Cox and Myers, William M. _927971 |
||
| 245 | _aFederalism, Intergovernmental relationships, and emergency response: A comparison of Australia and the United States | ||
| 260 | _aAmerican Review of Public Administration | ||
| 300 | _a50(6-7), Aug-Oct, 2020: p.525-535 | ||
| 520 | _aThe recent COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted governance. A strong intergovernmental response is critical for stemming the worst damage during the outset of a disaster. Collaborative planning with networks of constituent governments, medical experts, and emergency managers are needed to provide a holistic response to the highly technical and complex issues brought on by the novel coronavirus. This commentary highlights the differences in response by the United States and Australia, provides a comparison of intergovernmental relationships, and sheds light on how these federations vertical and horizontal collaborative efforts were stymied by politics or facilitated by existing intergovernmental forums. - Reproduced | ||
| 650 |
_aExecutive federalism, Intergovernmental relations, Disaster response, Australia _925683 |
||
| 773 | _aAmerican Review of Public Administration | ||
| 906 | _aFEDERALISM | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||