| 000 | 01377nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c517750 _d517750 |
||
| 008 | 210727b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aYan, Bo et al _927983 |
||
| 245 | _aWhy do countries respond differently to Covid-19? A comparative study of Sweden, China, France, and Japan | ||
| 260 | _aAmerican Review of Public Administration | ||
| 300 | _a50(6-7), Aug-Oct, 2020: p.762-769 | ||
| 520 | _aNonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are important public health tools to fight against COVID-19. Governments around the world have instituted a variety of NPIs to modify individuals’ behavior, giving rise to four distinct pandemic response strategies: nudge, mandate, decree, and boost. To better understand the different policy choices involved in these strategies, four countries including Sweden, China, France, and Japan were compared to identify the critical institutional and cultural determinants of national response strategy. The finding shows that various responses regarding same threat are dependent on the distinctive institutional arrangements and cultural orientation of each country, and thus, there is no One-Size-Fits-All strategy. – Reproduced | ||
| 650 |
_aCOVID-19, Institutional arrangements, Cultural orientation, Response strategy _925878 |
||
| 773 | _aAmerican Review of Public Administration | ||
| 906 | _aCOVID 19 PANDEMIC | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||