| 000 | 01630nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c518085 _d518085 |
||
| 008 | 210816b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aFred, Mats _928487 |
||
| 245 | _aLocal government projectification in practice – a multiple institutional logic perspective | ||
| 260 | _aLocal Government Studies | ||
| 300 | _a46(3), Jun, 2020: p.351-370 | ||
| 520 | _aDuring the last couple of decades, we have witnessed a proliferation of the project as an organizational solution in sectors as diverse as IT, housing, social services, education and culture. Despite a growing interest in the phenomenon, we know surprisingly little of how processes of public sector projectification unfold in practice, especially at local government level. This article uses an institutional logic perspective to illustrate and argue that public sector projectification can be understood and conceptualized as the enactment of multiple, co-existing institutional logics, but where one particular logic is of growing importance – the project logic. It is argued that even though the project form is often perceived as more flexible than that of the bureaucracy, the practical outcome seldom represents a radical break with traditional, bureaucratic management models. Rather, it appears to aid a rediscovery and reuse of central bureaucratic practices and procedures such as reporting, documentation and standardization. – Reproduced | ||
| 650 |
_aProjectification, Institutional logics, Local government practices, Bureaucratization, Ethnography _926887 |
||
| 773 | _aLocal Government Studies | ||
| 906 | _aLOCAL GOVERNMENT | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||