000			01663nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c518426 _d518426
008			210923b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aUpadhyaya, P. et al _929452
245			_aCapacity building for proportionate climate policy: Lessons from India and South Africa
260			_aInternational Political Science Review
300			_a42(1), Jan, 2021: p.130-145
520			_aCountries must develop their capacity to credibly revise their nationally determined contributions (NDCs) proportionate to the global climate goal. This paper argues that long-lasting capacity is necessarily embedded in the institutions governing cooperation between state and non-state actors. This institutional capacity for cooperation is determined by the two interactive processes of conception and calibration, where the state plays a definitive role in mediating between competing interests. In conception, the state uses its discretionary power to set the long-term vision, whereas during calibration it exercises flexibility to accommodate concerns and capacity of other actors. We conclude that proportionality of policy response is better understood, and achieved, through the convergence of both these processes. Drawing on climate policy experiences of India and South Africa, we recommend that successful implementation and enhancement of NDCs would require a greater emphasis on capacity building for calibration in developing countries. – Reproduced
650			_aImplementation, Capacity building, Climate ambition, India, South Africa, Proportionality _927553
773			_aInternational Political Science Review
906			_aCLIMATE POLICY
942			_cAR