| 000 | 01218nam a22001457a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c518524 _d518524 |
||
| 008 | 210928b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aSundar, K. R. Shyam _929593 |
||
| 245 | _aCOVID-19 and state failure: A double whammy for trade unions and labour rights | ||
| 260 | _aThe Indian Journal of Labour Economics | ||
| 300 | _a63(1), Oct, 2020: p.97-103 | ||
| 520 | _aThe Constitution of India, the International Labour Standards (ILS) framework of the ILO (comprising Conventions and Recommendations) and its pradigms like the Decent Work, Judge-made law (i.e. judgments delivered primarily by the Supreme Court) and social dialogue (both tripartite and bipartite) together determine the labour laws and rule-making processes in the Industrial Relations System (IRS) in India. This has been the classic framework that was followed largely during the command economy period in India, i.e. 1947–1991. With economic liberalisation, employers demand labour law governance (inspection) and reforms to afford labour flexibility to them (shortly, Labour Market Flexibility, LMF). – Reproduced | ||
| 773 | _aThe Indian Journal of Labour Economics | ||
| 906 | _aCOVID-19 (DISEASE) - ECONOMIC ASPECTS | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||