000			02074nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c518863 _d518863
008			211216b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aShah, Priti Pradhan et al _931096
245			_aThings are not always what they seem: The origins and evolution of intragroup conflict
260			_aAdministrative Science Quarterly
300			_a66(2), Jun, 2021: p.426-474
520			_aTeams scholars have historically conceptualized and measured intragroup conflict at the team level. But emerging evidence suggests that perceptions of intragroup conflict are often not uniform, shared, or static. These findings suggest important questions about the microfoundations of intragroup conflict: Where does conflict within teams originate? And how does it evolve over time? We address these and other questions in three abductive studies. We consider four origination points—an individual, dyad, subgroup, or team—and three evolutionary trajectories—conflict continuity, contagion, and concentration. Study 1, a qualitative study of narrative accounts, and Study 2, a longitudinal social networks study of student teams, reveal that fewer than 30 percent of teams experience team-level conflict. Instead, conflict more commonly originates and persists at individual, dyadic, or subgroup levels. Study 2 further demonstrates that traditional psychometric intragroup conflict scales mask the existence of these various origins and trajectories of conflict. Study 3, a field study of manufacturing teams, reveals that individual and dyadic task conflict origins positively predict team performance, whereas traditional intragroup task conflict measures negatively predict team performance. The results raise serious concerns about current methods and theory in the team conflict literature and suggest that researchers must go beyond team-level conceptualizations of conflict. – Reproduced
650			_aDyadic conflict, Intragroup conflict, Subgroups, Temporal dynamics _928852
773			_aAdministrative Science Quarterly
906			_aCONFLICT MANAGEMENT
942			_cAR