| 000 | 01371nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c518973 _d518973 |
||
| 008 | 211229b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aHall, Daniel M. and Bonanomi, Marcella M. _932435 |
||
| 245 | _aGoverning collaborative project delivery as a common-pool resource scenario | ||
| 260 | _aProject Management Journal | ||
| 300 | _a52(3), Jun, 2021: p.250-263 | ||
| 520 | _aWhen collaborative project delivery models such as integrated project delivery (IPD) combine project resources, share decision-making rights, and distribute risk-and-reward among participants, the project can be conceptualized as a common-pool resource scenario. Multiple project appropriators have contractual rights to withdraw units from the shared resource system (i.e., the project budget). This theorization suggests project managers avoid the tragedy of the project by crafting effective self-governance structures in the face of pluralism. Using IPD as an example, this article suggests these project governance structures reflect Ostrom’s design principles for the successful governance of long-enduring common-pool resource scenarios. – Reproduced | ||
| 650 |
_aCommon-pool resources, Integrated project delivery, Project alliancing, Project delivery model, Project governance _928988 |
||
| 773 | _aProject Management Journal | ||
| 906 | _aPROJECT MANAGEMENT | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||