000			01404nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c518999 _d518999
008			220118b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aAbdo, Alexandre Hannud _931894
245			_aMissed marks: This is no longer the 20th century
260			_aSocial Science Information
300			_a60(3), Sep, 2021: p.318-323
520			_aFollowing an invitation by the editors of Social Science Information to react to an article by Olof Hallonsten, this article joins a debate about ways of evaluating science in our current context. This article presents an argument in support of the following four assertions and their importance to properly approach today the transformations of science evaluation and governance in the last decades: (a) scientific communities have failed to update their self-governance as societies transitioned from ‘rural-labor societies’ to ‘urban-knowledge societies’; (b) the ensuing discrepancy from expectations contributed to the economization of science; (c) we must consider two distinct processes of democratization; and (d) geopolitics plays an important role in the establishment of commodification in wealthy nations. – Reproduced
650			_aknowledge society, Open science, Research evaluation, Responsible research and innovation, Sociology of science _929127
773			_aSocial Science Information
906			_aSCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
942			_cAR