| 000 | 01265nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c519174 _d519174 |
||
| 008 | 220212b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aMörth, Ulrika _932067 |
||
| 245 | _aCan anyone implement the law: The discourse and practice of externalizing legal authority | ||
| 260 | _aAdministration and Society | ||
| 300 | _a53(9), Oct, 2021: p.1315-1336 | ||
| 520 | _aAllowing private companies to de facto exercise legal authority is becoming increasingly common in several countries. Externalizing legal authority is sustained by a discourse replacing a conventional institutional approach to law enforcement with a functional approach where the agent is less important than efficiency and expected outcomes. Drawing on two brief case studies in Sweden—automobile inspections and reviews of international financial transactions—we argue that legal authority is transferred to for-profit actors with only a minimum of safeguards and accountability. For-profit actors are legal authority insiders but outsiders in the democratic chain of accountability. – Reproduced | ||
| 650 |
_aExternalizing legal authority, Functional agent, Legality, Implementation _929780 |
||
| 773 | _aAdministration and Society | ||
| 906 | _aCORPORATE GOVERNANCE | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||