| 000 | 01749nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c519472 _d519472 |
||
| 008 | 220315b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aLiu,Ting-An-Xu et al _932509 |
||
| 245 | _aRevisiting “big questions” of public administration after COVID-19: A systematic review | ||
| 260 | _aAsia Pacific Journal of Public Administration | ||
| 300 | _a43(3), Sep, 2021: p.131-168 | ||
| 520 | _aThe COVID-19 pandemic has imposed changes on governments across the world. Scholars responded to this crisis with a wide range of comparative studies and theoretical alternatives that addressed “big questions” of public administration. To summarise what we now know about governments, citizens, and civil society as a result of this pandemic, we conduct a systematic review of 188 articles using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. While the range of topics addressed was broad, we began our review by narrowing our focus ex-ante to studies that addressed three “big questions” of public administration: (1) What are the instruments of collective action?; (2) How shall tensions between national and subnational governments be resolved?; and (3) How can processes of societal learning be improved? Two additional “big questions” later emerged from the review process itself: (4) How can public trust in governments be fostered? and (5) Do public services enhance social equity? Answers to each of these questions are reviewed in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. – Reproduced | ||
| 650 |
_aCovid-19,Systematic review, Public administration, Big questions _930535 |
||
| 773 | _aAsia Pacific Journal of Public Administration | ||
| 906 | _aPUBLIC ADMINISTRATION | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||