000			01726nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c519863 _d519863
008			220511b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aMcDonnell, D. Wnrner, A. and Karlsson, M. _933150
245			_aReputation versus office: Why populist radical right governmental participation has differed between Sweden and Denmark
260			_aInternational Political Science Review
300			_a42(5), Nov, 2021: p. 561-564
520			_aSweden and Denmark have presented contrasting relationships between centre-right and populist radical right (PRR) parties. In Sweden, the centre-right has refused cooperation with the Sweden Democrats (Sverigedemokraterna) (SD), even when this cost the centre-right office. However, in Denmark, coalitions led by centre-right parties have cooperated with the Danish People’s Party (Dansk Folkeparti) (DF) on multiple occasions. Through a controlled comparison, we examine what explains these different outcomes. Using Chapel Hill Expert Surveys and public opinion data, we firstly look at the policy congruence between parties and the social acceptability of cooperation. We then examine interview material with representatives from centre-right and PRR parties in Sweden and Denmark to see their explanations of cooperation and non-cooperation. We conclude that, while the office goals of Danish centre-right parties, along with the policy focus and uncontroversial past of DF, explain that case, the reputation and past of SD has precluded a similar outcome. – Reproduced
650			_aPopulist radical right, Coalition formation, Cordon sanitaire, Sweden, Denmark. _931093
773			_aInternational Political Science Review
906			_aPOLITICS AND GOVERNMENT
942			_cAR