000			01120nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c520430 _d520430
008			220914b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aMolander, Ander and Torsvik, Gaute _934053
245			_aIn their own best interest. is there a paternalistic case for welfare conditionality?
260			_aJournal of Social Policy
300			_a52(1), Jan, 2022: p.191-208
520			_aThis paper examines paternalism as a justification for welfare reforms making benefits conditional on participation in activation programs. We clarify different types of what we denote ‘throffer paternalism’ – a paternalism conjoining an offer with a threat – and ask whether there is a good case for any of them. We argue that hard but non-perfectionistic paternalism provides the most promising defense for mandatory activation but conclude that it does not give a convincing justification for this type of welfare policy. – Reproduced
650			_aWelfare conditionality, Welfare reform, Paternalism, Perfectionism, Throffer. _933009
773			_aJournal of Social Policy
906			_aWELFARE REFORMS
942			_cAR