000			01822nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c520448 _d520448
008			220915b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aLichter, D.T. parisi, D. and Taquino, M. _934073
245			_aInter-county migration and the spatial concentration of poverty: Comparing metro and nonmetro patterns
260			_aRural Sociology
300			_a87(1), Mar, 2021: p.119-185
520			_aWe use panel data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) to document the changing volume and rate of intercounty migration among the poor. We evaluate whether the exchange of migrants between metro and nonmetro counties has exacerbated spatial disparities in poverty and whether some nonmetro counties have become “collecting grounds” for America's poor. The PSID highlights exceptionally high rates of intercounty migration among the nonmetro population, but especially among the poor. The results show that rural poor migrants circulate among nonmetro counties, often from one poor county to an even poorer one. This circulation of poor rural migrants has exacerbated the concentration of poverty in the most economically disadvantaged nonmetro counties. Concentrated poverty also is exacerbated by the migration of the “best and brightest” from nonmetro-to-metro counties, which also is associated with upward residential attainment (to counties with lower poverty rates). Significantly, metro-to-nonmetro migration is both selective of the poor and strongly associated with downward residential mobility to poorer nonmetro counties. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that poor nonmetro counties have become collecting grounds for America's poor. – Reproduced
650			_aPanel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) _934074
773			_aRural Sociology
906			_aPOVERTY
942			_cAR