| 000 | 01166nam a22001457a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c520659 _d520659 |
||
| 008 | 220930b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aBerger, D. Herkenhoff, K. and Mongey, S. _934697 |
||
| 245 | _aLabor market power | ||
| 260 | _aThe American Economic Review | ||
| 300 | _a112(4), Apr, 2022: p.1147-1193 | ||
| 520 | _aWe develop, estimate, and test a tractable general equilibrium model of oligopsony with differentiated jobs and concentrated labor markets. We estimate key model parameters by matching new evidence on the relationship between firms' local labor market share and their employment and wage responses to state corporate tax changes. The model quantitatively replicates quasi-experimental evidence on imperfect productivity-wage pass-through and strategic wage setting of dominant employers. Relative to the efficient allocation, welfare losses from labor market power are 7.6 percent, while output is 20.9 percent lower. Lastly, declining local concentration added 4 percentage points to labor's share of income between 1977 and 2013. – Reproduced | ||
| 773 | _aThe American Economic Review | ||
| 906 | _aLABOUR MARKETS | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||